PDA

View Full Version : Free NOAA weather forecasts may be terminated


pmislinski
07-08-2005, 01:34 PM
This article is on BoatUS. I regularly use the free NOAA weather and surf forcasts before and during sailing trips. Seeing how I already paid for the satellites and instruments used to gather the data as well as the scientists salaries with my tax money I would be a little miffed if I would then have to pay additional fees to read the forecasts.

-----------------------
For more info and to help fight the bill:
http://www.boatus.com/gov/sb786.htm


SB 786 Proposes to Curtail Free Data from National Weather Service May 2005
Free NOAA weather radio could go the way of the eight-track tape player if Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) has his way.

Legislation introduced by Santorum, S. 786, would restrict NOAA’s broadcasting to emergency weather, like hurricanes and tornados and permit private companies like AccuWeather and The Weather Channel to get all of its daily weather information from NOAA for free. These companies would then turn around and sell the continuous weather updates to the public that NOAA used to provide free of charge.

Such a drastic change in the public’s access to critical weather information could endanger the safety of boat owners who routinely rely on this information to make basic decisions about when to head out of port or when to return. BoatU.S. has contacted each U.S. senator advising them of our opposition to this bill.

S. 786 would only allow NOAA to issue severe weather warnings to the public when conditions were life threatening. The bill would save no money for the government because in order to issue such warnings, all the routine data collection and monitoring work must go on regardless. In addition, the “non-critical” data for boaters, such as tides, wind direction, speed and movement of fronts, can be just as important as storm warnings.

Gail
07-08-2005, 01:45 PM
This has been referenced repeatedly on various sailing forums and in the media over the past several months. Last I hear, Santorum's bill was so outrageous that no one had signed on as a co-sponsor and it appeared to be the laughing stock of Capitol Hill.

Of course that's not to say that it won't get tacked on to something else as an amendment.

I wrote to our Congressional delegation about this months ago; I trust you will do the same.

rmjohns
07-08-2005, 01:45 PM
We'll see if I get any feedback

pmislinski
07-08-2005, 01:49 PM
As with anything that gets done in our government and is tied to some form of special interest it's good to stay on top of it. Having seen it on only one other board I figured it was worth throwing it out there again. I e-mailed both Senators from Hawaii. Every little bit makes a difference.

Cheers,

Phil

Tom Keffer
08-02-2005, 07:24 PM
I like Senator Rick Santorum's proposal to privatize US Weather Service Products. In fact, I think we should follow his idea in other government areas.

For example, why not privatize the EPA's air pollution warnings? The taxpayers pay to collect the data, but why just give such important information out for free? Why, if you want to know if it's safe to go outside, you ought to pay for it. To a private company.

Or, how about election results? Why do we just give this information away? Again, if you really want to know who won an election, you can buy the results, and the rest of us will just stay ignorant. This way, as Sen. Santorum points out, the government wouldn't be "competing" with private outlets.

-tk

Roger Shields
08-05-2005, 05:41 PM
I sent the Boat US email letter to my congressmen and received an email from my Senator Dodd that he agrees with me about my concerns over the next supreme court nominee!!!! So much for the impact of email over the written letter which they will no longer accept!!